[Comorbidities in multiple sclerosis and their influence on the choice of treatment]. / Comorbilidades en la esclerosis múltiple y su influencia en la elección del tratamiento.

Clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for people with multiple sclerosis (pMS) are conducted in selected populations, excluding patients with comorbidities or concomitant medications. However, a large percentage of pMS have some additional disease, which could affect the response and choice of the DMT. The objective of this review is to assess how concurrent pathologies can impact the choice of DMTs. Relevant articles were selected through a systematic search in PubMed. Comorbidities were grouped for better classification into autoimmune, chronic infections, cardiovascular and metabolic, oncological and neuropsychiatric. In autoimmune pathologies, it is key to take into account the effects of TME on them and the possibility of interaction with their specific treatments. Immunomodulatory therapies are safe for people with chronic infections. Immunosuppressive treatments are generally contraindicated in people with active infections. In cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibodies, and the phenomena of starting treatment with S1P modulators, must be taken into account. DMTs with an immunosuppressive effect are contraindicated in people with active malignancies. Although psychiatric pathology per se does not preclude the use of DMTs, caution should be exercised when new psychiatric symptoms appear. For these reasons, among the multiple factors that must be considered when starting or changing a DMT in pMS, comorbidities constitute a decisive element.

TITLE: Comorbilidades en la esclerosis múltiple y su influencia en la elección del tratamiento.Los estudios clínicos de tratamientos para personas con esclerosis múltiple (pEM) se realizan en poblaciones seleccionadas, que excluyen a pacientes que presenten comorbilidades o medicaciones concomitantes. Sin embargo, un gran porcentaje de las pEM tiene alguna enfermedad adicional, que podría afectar a la respuesta y la elección del tratamiento. El objetivo de esta revisión es valorar cómo pueden las diferentes patologías concurrentes impactar en la elección de las terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad (TME) en las pEM. Se seleccionaron artículos relevantes mediante búsqueda en PubMed. Las comorbilidades se agruparon, a los fines de mejor ordenamiento de los artículos encontrados, en patologías diversas: autoinmunes, infecciones crónicas, cardiovasculares, respiratorias, metabólicas, oncológicas, neuropsiquiátricas y epilepsia. En cuanto a las patologías autoinmunes, es clave tener en cuenta los efectos de las TME sobre ellas y la posibilidad de interacción con sus tratamientos específicos. Las terapias inmunomoduladoras son seguras para personas con infecciones crónicas. Los tratamientos inmunosupresores, en general, están contraindicados en personas con infecciones activas. En las comorbilidades cardiovasculares y metabólicas deben tenerse en cuenta las potenciales reacciones de infusión asociadas a anticuerpos monoclonales, y los fenómenos asociados al inicio de tratamiento con moduladores del receptor de la esfingosina-1-fosfato. Las TME con efecto inmunosupresor están contraindicadas en personas con malignidades activas. Aunque la patología psiquiátrica de por sí no impide el uso de TME, debería tenerse precaución cuando aparecen nuevos síntomas psiquiátricos, y siempre tenerse en cuenta su monitorización y tratamiento. Por este motivo, entre los múltiples factores que deben considerarse a la hora de iniciar o cambiar una TME en pEM, las comorbilidades constituyen un elemento muchas veces decisivo.

Differential diagnosis and prognosis for longitudinally extensive myelitis in Buenos Aires, Argentina. / Diagnósticos diferenciales y pronóstico de las mielitis longitudinales extensas en Buenos Aires, Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Longitudinally extensive myelitis (LETM) has classically been grouped with the full or limited neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). However, differential diagnosis reveals a wide range of aetiologies. OBJECTIVE: To report on differential diagnosis and prognosis for LETM observed in a group of patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective multicentre study in two hospitals in Buenos Aires from June 2008 to June 2014. INCLUSION CRITERIA: medullary syndrome associated with spinal cord lesion extending for 3 or more contiguous spinal segments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical, radiological, and biochemical data were collected and subjects were rated on the Hughes functional disability scale (WHFDS) at 3 months. RESULTS: We evaluated 27 patients, 74% of whom were women; mean age was 35.22 years. The NMO-IgG antibody test was performed in 66.6% and oligoclonal band testing in 71%. NMO-IgG seropositivity was found exclusively in NMOSD patients (75%). Brain MRI was normal in 59.2% and revealed a mean of 7.9 affected spinal segments. Differential diagnoses revealed NMOSD (37%), idiopathic LETM (22.2%), lupus (11.1%), tumour (11.1%), dural fistula (7.4%), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (7.4%), and a single case of multiple sclerosis (3.7%). Patients with lesions to ≥ 7 spinal segments showed poor recovery at 3 months (P<.001); these cases were associated with neoplastic, vascular, idiopathic, and lupus-related aetiologies. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent causes of LETM in our cohort were NMOSD followed by idiopathic cases. Neoplastic, vascular, lupus-related, and idiopathic LETM may constitute a critical group with a distinct prognosis and other treatment needs.

Neuromyelitis optica: association with paroxysmal painful tonic spasms. / Neuromielitis óptica: asociación con espasmos tónicos paroxísticos dolorosos.

INTRODUCTION: Paroxysmal painful tonic spasms (PPTS) were initially described in multiple sclerosis (MS) but they are more frequent in neuromyelitis optica (NMO). The objective is to report their presence in a series of cases of NMO and NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD), as well as to determine their frequency and clinical features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective assessment of medical histories of NMO/NMOSD patients treated in 2 hospitals in Buenos Aires (Hospital Durand and Hospital Álvarez) between 2009 and 2013. RESULTS: Out of 15 patients with NMOSD (7 with definite NMO and 8 with limited NMO), 4 presented PPTS (26.66%). PPTS frequency in the definite NMO group was 57.14% (4/7). Of the 9 patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 44.44% (9/15) presented PPTS. Mean age was 35 years (range, 22-38 years) and all patients were women. Mean time between NMO diagnosis and PPTS onset was 7 months (range, 1-29 months) and mean time from last relapse of LETM was 30 days (range 23-40 days). LETM (75% cervicothoracic and 25% thoracic) was observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in all patients. Control over spasms and pain was achieved in all patients with carbamazepine (associated with gabapentin in one case). No favourable responses to pregabalin, gabapentin, or phenytoin were reported. CONCLUSIONS: PPTS are frequent in NMO. Mean time of PPTS onset is approximately one month after an LETM relapse, with extensive cervicothoracic lesions appearing on the MRI scan. They show an excellent response to carbamazepine but little or no response to pregabalin and gabapentin. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are necessary in order to confirm these results.